Electoral reform in Honduras: Barrientos’ key proposal

In Honduras, discussions about the involvement of the military in elections have become significant after various incidents sparked debate and skepticism. An internal review by the National Electoral Council (CNE) criticized the armed forces for operational shortcomings during the primary elections, and selective disarmament of officers has led to doubts concerning the impartiality of the military.

In this context, attorney and constitutional specialist Julio César Barrientos has advocated for a change in the constitution to remove the military from any involvement in election-related activities, stating that their involvement undermines the process’s integrity and impartiality.

Information from the CNE and inquiries regarding the armed forces’ involvement in voting processes

The CNE audit report revealed significant deficiencies in the Armed Forces’ compliance with logistical protocol during the primary elections. Unjustified route deviations, the retention of electoral transport units, the incomplete delivery of technological kits to rural areas, and a lack of communication between military commanders and electoral coordinators were identified. These irregularities caused delays in the opening of polling stations and raised doubts about the transparency of the process. The lack of response from the military high command and the government to these accusations has intensified mistrust.

Considering this scenario, opposition groups have called for an examination of the pact between the CNE and the military, the involvement of international observers, and independent audits of the results dissemination system. In this environment, attorney Barrientos has labeled as “outdated, risky, and susceptible to manipulation” the constitutional rule assigning the military the task of securing ballot containers, distributing voting materials, and offering logistical support to the CNE. Barrientos contends that having the military involved in civilian matters undermines institutional impartiality and creates opportunities for political influence and deceit.

Suggested change to the constitution and dissatisfaction in the military

Barrientos suggests a reform to the constitution that would hand over electoral responsibilities to a Technical Electoral Directorate under the CNE. This body would employ civilian staff, provide specialized training, and ensure complete transparency. The aim of this proposal is to update and protect the electoral processes from any military influence. Barrientos’ appeal aligns with increasing demands for elections led by civilians, not the military.

Nevertheless, the debate extends beyond logistical issues and the suggested changes to the constitution. The choice by the Joint Chiefs of Staff to target specific Armed Forces officers for disarmament has sparked worry in different circles. Based on accounts from military insiders and reports, this disarmament is not being uniformly enforced but is instead directed at officers who have shown independent or critical views towards the governing party. This action is seen as a covert cleansing effort within the military, leading to unease and dissatisfaction among mid- and senior-level officers.

The main fear among opposition leaders is that, in the event of a possible defeat of the ruling party at the polls, the government will seek to use the Armed Forces to disregard the results or repress demonstrations. These events have fueled doubts about the government’s drift and the possible manipulation of the armed institutions.