Our website use cookies to improve and personalize your experience and to display advertisements(if any). Our website may also include cookies from third parties like Google Adsense, Google Analytics, Youtube. By using the website, you consent to the use of cookies. We have updated our Privacy Policy. Please click on the button to check our Privacy Policy.

Is the state of emergency in Honduras working against gangs?

Xiomara Castro

The emergency state in Honduras, in effect since December 2022, continues to spark debate due to its prolongation and worries about potential misuse of authority and breaches of human rights. This action was proclaimed by the government of President Xiomara Castro with the declared purpose of tackling criminal activities, especially extortion and the operations of gangs like Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13) and Barrio 18. The enforcement of the emergency state has resulted in the suspension of specific constitutional rights, enabling detentions without a warrant and limiting freedom of movement in different regions of the nation.

The state of emergency has been prolonged several times since it was first enacted. In January 2025, the duration was increased by 45 more days, affecting 226 of the nation’s 298 municipalities. While officials claim this measure is vital for battling crime, different groups have raised alarms about potential misuse and the absence of tangible outcomes.

Discussion about efficiency and civil liberties during emergency conditions

Entities like the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA) have highlighted that the emergency situation endangers civil rights, calling on the Honduran government to ensure adherence to legal norms and prevent unnecessary limitations on basic liberties. The authorities have claimed a reduction in homicide cases and the breakup of criminal groups during the state of emergency. Nevertheless, accounts suggest that extortion and violence still impact the community. Moreover, there are recorded instances of misconduct by law enforcement, including arbitrary arrests and excessive force.

The continuation of this action has led to a discussion regarding its efficiency and impact on civil liberties. Although the government claims that the emergency decree is essential for fighting crime, both local and global entities are urging for an evaluation of its use and assurances that protective measures do not undermine the basic rights of individuals.

In this way, Honduras’s state of emergency is a debated approach aimed at addressing criminal violence but has ignited discussions regarding its efficiency, legality, and human rights considerations. Prolonging this extraordinary step presents obstacles to upholding essential liberties and establishing a democratic framework that safeguards both citizen security and their rights.

By Thomas Greenwood